I marvel at the perfection of this photograph. Was its juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated images casual or planned, irrational or brilliant, and what was going on inside the head of the cat? I gave
up marijuana because it had come to make my world so weird that I would get
lost in my mind, yet I find myself seeking out marijuana-like experiences that
cause me to get lost in my mind, experiences that are more intimidating
than marijuana because they take me so far adrift that I can never quite return to
where I started.
Few
people would be strongly affected by this photograph. Cat-lovers would smile and find it relaxing, while cat-haters would become so fixated on the
object of their hatred that they would be blind to everything else. I find it as deep, mysterious, and frightening as a glimpse into the far side of the universe. It leaves my stomach weightless, and it saddens me more than the photo of that naked Vietnamese girl, the execution of that Vietcong man, or the planes
crashing into the twin towers. While they merely speak of the cruelty, shallowness, stupidity, terror, and misery of my species, this photograph juxtaposes mortality and infinitude, contentment and isolation, beauty and meaninglessness, perfection and casualness, mundanity and ethereality, superficiality and depth. It pronounces life as the purpose of life.
...I’ll let you in on a secret. I have often felt
both inferior and superior to everyone around me, but with the passing years (but especially since I broke my back on November 30),
I have come to compare myself to others less, my more recent feeling being that
I have simply moved to a distant realm, and am therefore limited in my ability to relate
to them, or them to me.
My
goal with hallucinogenics was to feel as I do now, but having achieved that
goal in the absence of drugs, I miss normalcy, and I worry that I might eventually travel so far that I'll be permanently alone in the universe. Indeed, I am already alone—just as we all are—but it’s one
thing to be a certain way and pretend you're not, and another
to be unable to forget that you're that way. I see others as through the wrong end of a telescope. Inside my head,
worlds collide, and I am in wonder that no one hears them. I have no ground on which to stand and no voice to guide me. Maybe this is wisdom, or what some call God,
or borderline insanity. I just know that it is interesting but not fun, and that it seems far from safe. Rather, it is reminiscent of the insights that one
might expect just before death when the things that one spent a lifetime fretting over have ceased to matter. Ironically, I conduct myself much as before because I live a
contradiction between what I know of the groundlessness of reality versus the
only methods I know—or used to think I knew—to achieve security (possessions,
orderliness, leisure, intimacy, projects, exercise, time outdoors), and I so crave security that I would do
anything to possess it, even sacrificing my integrity if such a thing were
possible. Unfortunately, perhaps, I possess an integrity beyond choice, an integrity for which I can no credit and that, like everything else about me, will
soon be extinguished.
“…Waking
at four to soundless dark, I stare.
In
time the curtain-edges will grow light.
Till
then I see what’s really always there:
Unresting
death, a whole day nearer now...” —Philip Larkin
People generally think that being high means being happy, but being high simply means being
altered, and this means that taking drugs often represents an attempt, not to get high, but to escape being high. Sedatives, for example. Narcotics, for
example. Tranquilizers, for example. Alcohol, for example.
I
saw my internist last week and, at my request, he prescribed Cymbalta. I’ve
had it before, but I don’t think I was on it for long,
and I’m not even sure I worked up to a full dose. Until a few months ago, when it went
generic, Cymbalta was expensive. Even now, it will cost me $205 a month ($42
after my $360 yearly deductible), which isn’t a lot—as drugs go—but
it is one more expense added to many such expenses (I just paid $1,400 for an
adjustable bed), so I debated long and hard whether to ask for it. If it works,
it will even me out while at the same time reducing my pain. Pain alone can made a person crazy, and I’m tired of being crazy. I want the
insights that come with pain and the proximity of death, but I need respite
from the weirdness, yet I worry that the drug will
numb me because that’s what such drugs have done in the past. They build a
floor that keeps me from the pit, but they also impose a ceiling that shuts
out the stars. I regard Cymbalta as my last resort because no other drug has so
great a potential to alter both pain and mood, and because I don’t know what
else to do, having tried many things over many years.
I
read a book about Sigmund Freud recently, and the author made what to me was
the strangest comment. He said that Freud
was so troubled that he reflected upon death everyday, to which I thought, Only everyday?
“Unresting
death, a whole day nearer now…” —Larkin
“I
fear no foe with thee at hand to bless. Ills have no weight and tears no
bitterness. Where death thy sting; where grave thy victory?” Henry Francis Lyte
“No
trick dispels. Religion used to try…” —Larkin
“Boris:
“Nothingness. Non-existence. Black emptiness.’
“Sonia:
‘What did you say?’
“Boris:
‘I was just planning my future.’” —Woody
Allen
To
be preoccupied with death is very different from being preoccupied
with work, bills, and family, because the others admit of resolution. Death is resolution, but it is resolution by annihilation, and annihilation itself can never be resolved. I don't, therefore, see death as resolution but as of the end of any possibility of resolution.
My diminishing number of posts is not due to unwillingness to share but to an
absence of words and confidence. If
the gulf between myself and others is such that I can’t make myself understood
about things that I once felt sure I could express, how can I make myself
understood about things that I’m sure I can’t express, and in which, to put it
bluntly, I don’t think there’s much interest anyway.
I
saw all I could stand of House on
Haunted Hill last night, shocked that such a boring and silly movie could
have had such an overwhelming and lasting impact on me in 1958 (unless I was an entirely different person then, and I don’t think I was). I interpreted my opposing
perceptions to suggest that an equal amount of change might still be possible for me in a mere 75 minutes. Then I remembered that 75 minutes is an enormous amount of time, it having only taken a second for me to fall out of that tree on November 30, and even that was a veritable eternity given that more change can come into a person's life in a millisecond than in the rest of life combined.
“We
are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings
having a human experience.” —Pierre
Teilhard de Chardin
This
is the kind of statement that leaves atheists cold, but due to my need for
security (taking such a view would permit me to overlay my humanity with a
superior persona that would allow me to transcend a portion of the pain), and
my desire to be fair to people whose beliefs differ from my own, I tried to
discover how Chardin defined spiritual
being so that I could make sense of his statement, but so far as I know, he
never defined it. I angrily wondered if he had knowingly devoted his life to promulgating
an undefined concept, and this left me to suspect that his statement was nothing more than rhetorical pablum, by which I mean an utterance that could only be considered
deep and comforting by the shallow; sort of a counterexample of the
profundity with which House on Haunted
Hill impressed me when I was nine.
As
I continued to ponder what he might have meant, it came to me in the wee hours that
spirit is consciousness in the absence of matter. This is surely obvious, but since
I had never put it into words, I was pleased with my 3:00 a.m. perceptiveness until it
struck me that such a definition is no better than defining a unicorn as a flying horse
with a horn on its head. To envision what
something is, doesn’t suggest that it
is, although, to be strictly honest, many things—everything, really—exists
without me having a clue as to what it is, how it came to be, or even how it can be; I only know
how things appear to me, and I am losing even that. To live with awe and wonder
is entertaining, but to live with nothing but awe and wonder has removed the earth
from beneath my feet and left me nauseous and floating.
“And
then all of a sudden, there it was, clear as day: existence had suddenly
unveiled itself. It had lost the harmless look of an abstract category: it was
the very paste of things..., this [chestnut] root was kneaded into existence. Or
rather the root, the park gates, the bench, the sparse grass, all that had
vanished: the diversity of things, their individuality, were only an
appearance, a veneer. This veneer had melted, leaving soft, monstrous masses,
all in disorder—naked, in a frightful, obscene nakedness… All these objects . .
. how can I explain? They inconvenienced me; I would have liked them to exist
less strongly, more dryly, in a more abstract way, with more reserve.” Sartre
Thus
did Sartre define what it means to me to be really high. It is not a good
place to get stuck, but I am stuck, and the proximity of death makes it
impossible for me to come down.
“…existence
hides itself. It is there, around us, in us, it is us, you can’t say two words
without mentioning it, but you can never touch it.” Sartre